Shim Trigger Question

[whmoorejr]

I want to trigger off the activity of a shim device. (every update of the device). I first set up the trigger using the shim specific triggers, but the trigger never 'triggers'. Setting up the trigger as a 'device state change' does work. Is this normal behavior, a plugin issue or user error: (Note: There are no conditions with any of these. The action just executes a script.)

Trigger 1 (never 'triggers'):

Trigger1.png (46.7 KiB) Viewed 1455 times

Trigger 2 (never 'triggers'):

Trigger2.png (52.16 KiB) Viewed 1455 times

Trigger 3 (Triggers as expected/action runs):

Trigger3.png (17.46 KiB) Viewed 1455 times

My appologies if I was unclear with my description in another topic thread.

Side question: Can I skip the "Shim" trigger alltogher and add an action to the Connector Match trigger? I only ask this because this is the first time I've seen the use of a trigger without an action.

[FlyingDiver]

That's strange. I need debug logs for both the connector and shim plugins when one of these messages arrives. Probably better to create a GitHub issue for this.

You should be able to trigger off the message received at the connector. The only reason that the connector plugin has the shortcut "action" is because I was afraid that a flood of MQTT messages arriving very rapidly could cause a race condition where a subsequent MQTT message received could overwrite the connector state values before an action could process them.

[whmoorejr]

That's strange. I need debug logs for both the connector and shim plugins when one of these messages arrives. Probably better to create a GitHub issue for this.

No problem. I'll stop posting on this thread and move this over to GitHub.

You should be able to trigger off the message received at the connector. The only reason that the connector plugin has the shortcut "action" is because I was afraid that a flood of MQTT messages arriving very rapidly could cause a race condition where a subsequent MQTT message received could overwrite the connector state values before an action could process them.

Yeah, that's why I was hesitant on using that action.

[FlyingDiver]

You should be able to trigger off the message received at the connector. The only reason that the connector plugin has the shortcut "action" is because I was afraid that a flood of MQTT messages arriving very rapidly could cause a race condition where a subsequent MQTT message received could overwrite the connector state values before an action could process them.

Yeah, that's why I was hesitant on using that action.

It's really only an issue if you actually need data from the topic or payload to be passed to the action (via device state). If the actions can run just based on the initial trigger, it should be fine.

[whmoorejr]

I really don't need the data, so I can put the action in there. I just need to know that a message was received under that topic.