nsheldon wrote:Hi steinis.
Thanks for sharing the deCONZ information. I hadn't heard of that ZigBee hub before. That's actually quite nice that they're using such a similar API. It certainly makes writing applications and plugins to use it easier.
As you pointed out, modifying the Hue Lights plugin to work with the deCONZ hub appears to be somewhat trivial, but adding support for the large and expanding list of additional ZigBee devices might be where most of the work comes in.
I have no good way to test new code against a deCONZ hub or any associated devices, and the additional time required to handle end user support is probably more than I am able to provide. However, the Hue Lights plugin code and content is
available on GitHub. So, one could either branch that repository to create a new deCONZ variant of the Hue Lights plugin, or just borrow any code in there to be included in a deCONZ plugin.
steinis wrote:Hi Nathan
I was working on a deCONZ plugin for indigo when I so that the guys making the deCONZ hub are using the same format as the HUE API.
so I have a big question for you:)
Would it be an idea to integrate the deCONZ hub into the Hue plugin?
I have it running fine with your plugin now, only added the gateway name to the "dirty check";) (if "Philips hue bridge" not in r.content or "Phoscon-GW" not in r.content:)
So thats the easy part, the job is adding all the new devices supported by deCONZ(Not Hue).
I fully understand if this is to much, but since the gateways are so similar I needed to ask:)
Mr. Sheldon,
I want to thank you for developing and always enhancing this awesome Indigo plugin. I have used it with my Hue Bridge v2 for some years and it always worked flawlessly.
Just this week I decided to replace my Hue Bridge with a new solution, based on a Raspberry Pi 4 2GB sporting a new Dresden Elektronik CONBEE II Zigbee USB Gateway (also known as deCONZ), which acts as the new Zigbee controller (
https://phoscon.de/en/conbee2). I would like to let you know that I was pleasantly surprised to verify that your plugin also works perfectly with it.
The CONBEE II interface is not only small, and hardware manufacturer agnostic, it's also more powerful than the original Hue Bridge, which means it has a larger range. I was able to add 10 Hue lights, on different parts of the (brick and mortar) house, to it with no problem. Never had to move bulbs from their original location to get them to talk with the CONBEE II located on my network cabinet which lives right in the middle of my home.
All have been working as expected based on my Indigo schedules. All I had to do was re-assign device numbers inside my original Hue Groups in Indigo.
For people enjoying Raspberry Pi computers:, Dresden Elektronik also manufactures a similar interface, the RASPBEE II (
https://phoscon.de/en/raspbee2), which connects to the Pi's GPIO pins. I see no reason why this internal interface won't also work with the Hue Lights plugin, since the software running on the Raspberry Pi to talk with the Zigbee interface is exactly the same.
Even though I deployed my new Zigbee controller also by using a RPi, I chose to go the USB way because I'm not quite sure I will never find the need to move it to my Mac computer in the future...
Once again, thank you very much for all your hard work and expertise.
Stay safe. I wish you and you family wonderful Holidays.
Cesar